Saroglitazar is noninferior to fenofibrate in reducing triglyceride levels in hypertriglyceridemic patients in a randomized clinical trial

Saroglitazar, being a dual PPAR-α/γ agonist, has shown beneficial effect in diabetic dyslipidemia and hypertriglyceridemia. Fibrates are commonly used to treat severe hypertriglyceridemia. However, the effect of saroglitazar in patients with moderate to severe hypertriglyceridemia was not evaluated. We conducted a study to compare the efficacy and safety of saroglitazar (4 mg) with fenofibrate (160 mg) in patients with moderate to severe hypertriglyceridemia. This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, double-dummy, active-control, and noninferiority trial in adult patients with fasting triglyceride (TG) levels of 500–1,500 mg/dl. The patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive daily dose of saroglitazar or fenofibrate for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was the percent change in TG levels at week 12 relative to baseline. The study comprised of 41 patients in the saroglitazar group and 41 patients in the fenofibrate group. We found that the percent reduction from baseline in TG levels at week 12 was significantly higher in the saroglitazar group (least square mean = ?55.3%; SE = 4.9) compared with the fenofibrate group (least square mean = ?41.1%; SE = 4.9; P = 0.048). Overall, 37 treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were reported in 24 patients (saroglitazar: 13; fenofibrate: 11). No serious AEs were reported, and no patient discontinued the study because of AEs. We conclude that saroglitazar (4 mg) is noninferior to fenofibrate (160 mg) in reducing TG levels after 12 weeks of treatment, was safe, and well tolerated.     

Reductive Biotransformation of Benzaldehyde Derivatives by Baker's Yeast in Non-Conventional Media: Effect of Substrate Hydrophobicity on the Biocatalytic Reaction

The reduction of six derivatives of benzaldehyde, α,α,α-trifluorotolualdehyde, nitrobenzaldehyde, anisaldehyde, fluorobenzaldehyde, tolualdehyde, chlorobenzaldehyde, each of which was substituted in the ortho-, meta- and para-positions, was investigated in whole cell yeast biotransformations conducted in non-conventional media. Correlation between hydrophobic (π) and electronic (σ) parameters of the substituent of the substrate and biocatalytic activity in organic solvent media (hexane containing 2% v/v water) was evaluated. While catalytic activity in general decreased as the substituent hydrophobicity (π) increased, the trend was more pronounced for ortho- substituents compared to meta- and para-. When the electronic parameters (σ) of the meta- and para- substituents were correlated with the catalytic activity, the opposite was observed, namely the catalytic activity increased as the electronic parameter of the substituent increased. This observation was similar for meta- and para- substituents.

Preliminary studies on the relationships between solvent and substrate polarity on the one hand and catalytic activity on the other are also presented and discussed.     

Prey: predator ratio dependence in the functional response of a freshwater amphipod

1. First known for their shredding activity, freshwater amphipods also behave as active predators with consequences for prey population regulation and amphipod coexistence in the context of biological invasions. 2. A way to quantify predation is to determine the average consumption rate per predator, also known as its functional response (FR). 3. Although amphipods are gregarious and can display social interactions that can alter per capita consumption rates, previous studies using the FR approach to investigate amphipod predation ignored such potential mutual interference because they did not consider variations in predator density. 4. We investigated the FR of Echinogammarus berilloni feeding on dipteran larvae with joint variations in prey and predator densities. This bivariate experimental design allowed us to estimate interference and to compare the fits of the three main classes of theoretical FR models, in which the predation rate is a function of prey density alone (prey‐dependent models), of both prey and predator densities (predator‐dependent models) or of the prey‐to‐predator ratio (ratio‐dependent models). 5. The Arditi–Ginzburg ratio‐dependent FR model provided the best representation of the FR of E. berilloni, whose predation rate showed a decelerating rise to a horizontal asymptote as prey abundance increased. 6. Ratio dependence means that mutual interference between amphipods leads to prey sharing. Mutual interference is likely to vary between amphipod species, depending on their level of aggressiveness.     

How tetrapods feed in water: a functional analysis by paradigm

Mechanical theory is used to erect a paradigm predicting the manipulations used by carnivorous aquatic amphibians, reptiles, birds and mammals to catch, subdue, process and swallow their prey. These predictions are confirmed by observational evidence. Most aquatic predatory tetrapods use long, prehensile tooth-armed jaws as pincer jaws to snap shut onto the prey and catch and kill it, although some use the flexibility of long necks in spear fishing and some odontocetes may stun prey with sonar. Most do not have cutting or nipping dentitions as these cannot be used on prey which is freely floating. They use caniniform dentition to hold and kill prey, or in some cases crushing dentition to break open hard-shelled prey. They dismember prey by dynamic loading, snatching bites so quickly that the prey tears. They use shake feeding, shaking the prey apart from side to side above the water. If the prey is too large to lift above the water they use twist feeding, twisting pieces off. Small pieces are easily swallowed but larger pieces are held above the water and swallowed by tilting the head back in gravity feeding, or by jerking the head back and forth in incrtial feeding. Some animals use mobile jaws to pull prey back into the mouth in ratchet feeding. Filter feeding evades these problems by feeding on very small prey. The use of paradigms in functional analysis is discussed with special reference to this work. The paradigm method is shown to be the most suitable one. There has been repeated convergent and parallel evolution of adaptations to feed in water.     

Sequential polypeptides: 5. Statistical mechanical analysis of helix-coil transition in sequential polypeptides

A statistical mechanical theory of the helix-coil transition in sequential polypeptides is developed assuming that the statistical weights of the Zimm-Bragg parameters of a given residue depend on the type of adjacent residues. In the case of a sequential polypeptide consisting of two kinds of residues, the theory describes the helix- coil transition of the polypeptide in terms of the Zimm-Bragg parameters associated with the corresponding residues. The theory is then used to determine this parameter, as a function of temperature, from experimental data for transition temperature as a function of solvent composition, for a series of sequential polypeptides consisting of Glu(OBzl) and Lys(Chz) residues in mixtures of dichloroacetic acid and 1,2-dichlorethane. This parameter is then combined with the Zimm-Bragg parameters for the parent homopolypeptides, and the theory used to predict helix coil transition curves which are in good agreement with the experimental ones for the sequential polypeptides studied.     

On Some Nuisance Parameter Free Uniformly Most Powerful Tests

TAKEUCHI (1969) provides a uniformly most powerful (UMP) one side test for testing the location parameter of the two parameters exponential model when the scale parameter is unknown. The power of his similar size α test depends, however, on the unknown scale parameter. In this case and in more general situations when there exists a sufficient statistic for the nuisance parameter, the theory of generalized THOMPSON's distributions, more specifically, the Thompsonization of a test statistic, LAURENT (1959, 1972) provides a UMP test whose power does not depend on the nuisance parameter. Examples of application of the general nuisance parameter free test procedure include here the truncated exponential, the inverse Gaussian, and the geometric distributions.